First, Do No Harm
Few professions have higher ethical standards than medicine, and for good reason. Caring for the health of others is a great responsibility; ethical standards keep it from being abused.
In theory, at least. In the practice, paying billions in fines for lack of ethics is better business for the pharma-medical complex than being ethical. Let that sink in for a moment.
The Dispatch has long been uneasy with the 'healthcare' complex and its white coat drug dealers. But what went down during the convid was a whole new dimension of fucked up. Iatrogenesis doesn't begin to cover it. There's a different word in the penal code for what really happened.
Bottom line, any remaining trust in 'healthcare' was euthanized and labelled as death by convid. It's gone and it ain't coming back.
The result of this is a healthier Dispatch. An apple a day, every day is leg day, no day is jab day and whatever it takes to keep the doctor far, far away. Taking responsibility over one's own health takes time and effort, but when the choice is between that or getting snuffed by medical protocols to pad the numbers, motivation is high. It is liberating to reclaim one's health from the clenched jaws of big pharma, big food and big gov. Life is really so much better without them.
But what about those healthcare professionals who went hook, line and sinker with the plandemic? Back then they were heroes, so overwhelmed by the convid that they could barely find time to practice dance routines.
Where are they now? Well, in the comments on a post at ZeroHedge regarding more convid lies uncovered by Israeli data there are, as usual, interesting insights from the readers. User NoDebt posted the following comment:
One of my sons was at the doctor a few months back. He's a cancer survivor and has had a few of his "factory installed" parts removed over the years, so they have to keep closer tabs on him than they would for somebody who hadn't been through such a thing.
Doctor asked a bunch of questions, as doctors often do. One of which was "has he been vaccinated against Covid?" Told him "no." He checks a box and quietly says "good." Nothing more was said about it after that. Had it been only a year prior I'm sure we would have received a good tongue-lashing about how important it is to have somebody like him vaccinated, etc., etc.
They know now. The docs and nurses on the ground floor of this know that "vaccine" is bad news. They'll NEVER be allowed to say it, of course, but they know.
This is where the abyss starts peering back. It's not that they will never be allowed to say it, rather they cannot allow themselves to say it. They have too much skin in the game –in fact, all of it. They failed on the principle of 'first do no harm' to themselves and their patients. They took the jab, so they are potential victims. But they gave it to others too, so they are potential perpetrators. Heads or tails, which is worse?
Excepting a small number of dissenting voices, the pharma-medical complex has chosen to double down, turning a blind eye to jab victims and excess deaths and doubtless wishing everyone would just STFU about the whole thing already.
Maybe they get their druthers. Maybe not. Some crimes have no statute of limitations and some people don't forget. The tick-tock they're hearing is not a social media platform....
Dispatch out.
PS: Update on Gonzalo Lira www.sott.net/article/480905-Father-of-Gonzalo-Lira-American-jailed-in-Ukraine-speaks-out-against-political-imprisonment